Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making

Yusuf Tansel Iç, Mustafa Yurdakul

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In conventional applications of hybrid DoE- TOPSIS technique in decision making problems, full factorial design layouts are generally used because of their ability to measure the effects of all possible combinations for evaluation factors. In a typical application, for a design layout, a number of replications are generated by assigning different sets of relative importance scores for evaluation factors. A TOPSIS score is then obtained for each experiment and replication pair. Regression analysis is finally applied to obtain a relationship with inputs (values of evaluation factors) and outputs (alternatives’ TOPSIS meta-model scores). The key in conventional application of hybrid DoE-TOPSIS technique is generation of relative importance scores. Each set of scores can be assigned by a decision maker or generated randomly. This paper aims to determine whether using either of the two methods in determination of relative importance scores makes any difference in the ranking orders of alternatives.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018
EditorsStefan Trzcielinski, Beata Mrugalska, Waldemar Karwowski, Massimo Di Nicolantonio, Emilio Rossi
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages411-424
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9783319941950
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019
EventJoint proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018 - Orlando, United States
Duration: Jul 21 2018Jul 25 2018

Publication series

NameAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume793
ISSN (Print)2194-5357

Conference

ConferenceJoint proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period7/21/187/25/18

Fingerprint

Decision making
Regression analysis
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Iç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M. (2019). Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making. In S. Trzcielinski, B. Mrugalska, W. Karwowski, M. Di Nicolantonio, & E. Rossi (Eds.), Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018 (pp. 411-424). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 793). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38

Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making. / Iç, Yusuf Tansel; Yurdakul, Mustafa.

Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018. ed. / Stefan Trzcielinski; Beata Mrugalska; Waldemar Karwowski; Massimo Di Nicolantonio; Emilio Rossi. Springer-Verlag, 2019. p. 411-424 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 793).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Iç, YT & Yurdakul, M 2019, Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making. in S Trzcielinski, B Mrugalska, W Karwowski, M Di Nicolantonio & E Rossi (eds), Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 793, Springer-Verlag, pp. 411-424, Joint proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018, Orlando, United States, 7/21/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38
Iç YT, Yurdakul M. Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making. In Trzcielinski S, Mrugalska B, Karwowski W, Di Nicolantonio M, Rossi E, editors, Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018. Springer-Verlag. 2019. p. 411-424. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38
Iç, Yusuf Tansel ; Yurdakul, Mustafa. / Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making. Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018. editor / Stefan Trzcielinski ; Beata Mrugalska ; Waldemar Karwowski ; Massimo Di Nicolantonio ; Emilio Rossi. Springer-Verlag, 2019. pp. 411-424 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).
@inproceedings{aafafcb3430049ac9fc7836c1fa3d5fe,
title = "Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making",
abstract = "In conventional applications of hybrid DoE- TOPSIS technique in decision making problems, full factorial design layouts are generally used because of their ability to measure the effects of all possible combinations for evaluation factors. In a typical application, for a design layout, a number of replications are generated by assigning different sets of relative importance scores for evaluation factors. A TOPSIS score is then obtained for each experiment and replication pair. Regression analysis is finally applied to obtain a relationship with inputs (values of evaluation factors) and outputs (alternatives’ TOPSIS meta-model scores). The key in conventional application of hybrid DoE-TOPSIS technique is generation of relative importance scores. Each set of scores can be assigned by a decision maker or generated randomly. This paper aims to determine whether using either of the two methods in determination of relative importance scores makes any difference in the ranking orders of alternatives.",
author = "I{\cc}, {Yusuf Tansel} and Mustafa Yurdakul",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319941950",
series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
pages = "411--424",
editor = "Stefan Trzcielinski and Beata Mrugalska and Waldemar Karwowski and {Di Nicolantonio}, Massimo and Emilio Rossi",
booktitle = "Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Understanding the Effect of Assignment of Importance Scores of Evaluation Criteria Randomly in the Application of DOE-TOPSIS in Decision Making

AU - Iç, Yusuf Tansel

AU - Yurdakul, Mustafa

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In conventional applications of hybrid DoE- TOPSIS technique in decision making problems, full factorial design layouts are generally used because of their ability to measure the effects of all possible combinations for evaluation factors. In a typical application, for a design layout, a number of replications are generated by assigning different sets of relative importance scores for evaluation factors. A TOPSIS score is then obtained for each experiment and replication pair. Regression analysis is finally applied to obtain a relationship with inputs (values of evaluation factors) and outputs (alternatives’ TOPSIS meta-model scores). The key in conventional application of hybrid DoE-TOPSIS technique is generation of relative importance scores. Each set of scores can be assigned by a decision maker or generated randomly. This paper aims to determine whether using either of the two methods in determination of relative importance scores makes any difference in the ranking orders of alternatives.

AB - In conventional applications of hybrid DoE- TOPSIS technique in decision making problems, full factorial design layouts are generally used because of their ability to measure the effects of all possible combinations for evaluation factors. In a typical application, for a design layout, a number of replications are generated by assigning different sets of relative importance scores for evaluation factors. A TOPSIS score is then obtained for each experiment and replication pair. Regression analysis is finally applied to obtain a relationship with inputs (values of evaluation factors) and outputs (alternatives’ TOPSIS meta-model scores). The key in conventional application of hybrid DoE-TOPSIS technique is generation of relative importance scores. Each set of scores can be assigned by a decision maker or generated randomly. This paper aims to determine whether using either of the two methods in determination of relative importance scores makes any difference in the ranking orders of alternatives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049687407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049687407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_38

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783319941950

T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

SP - 411

EP - 424

BT - Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control - Joint proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Advanced Production Management and Process Control, the AHFE International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing, and the AHFE International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, 2018

A2 - Trzcielinski, Stefan

A2 - Mrugalska, Beata

A2 - Karwowski, Waldemar

A2 - Di Nicolantonio, Massimo

A2 - Rossi, Emilio

PB - Springer-Verlag

ER -